Images better quality and a bit more saturated on Firefox compared to Chrome
Answered
Bombay posted this in #help-forum
BombayOP
Why? At least in development. Haven't tested in production yet
Answered by riský
firstly, can you actually try in production mode (
next build && next start) and can you share an example of the issue that you are facing...11 Replies
BombayOP
Using next.js@latest
Using Next.js <Image /> component with quality={100}
firstly, can you actually try in production mode (
next build && next start) and can you share an example of the issue that you are facing...Answer
@Bombay have you found a solution, or do you still need help?
@riský <@107596792421449728> have you found a solution, or do you still need help?
BombayOP
It seems that in dev the images stay a bit optimized and also a bit lower staturation in chrome
In production I see no difference between Chrome, Firefox
Thanks for taking the time, and sorry for ignoring
it must be some weird optimisations to encode the images faster ig
BombayOP
Yeah and firefox doesnt do that in dev but with chrome it happens
That is the weirdest for me
I'm closing this thread, have a good one mate